Pose-ensemble MLPs rerank docking hits for the hard nuclear receptor target LRH-1, yielding four putative binders

  • Poses from physics-based targeted docking and generative blind docking, across several receptor conformations, train two MLPs that predict binders or activators at the LRH-1 orthosteric pocket, avoiding dependence on one pose or one score.
  • On a chemically distinct out-of-distribution set, the models found dissimilar compounds and responded to single-scaffold edits, suggesting use in lead optimization.
  • A small prospective campaign produced four putative binders, and combining docking scores with MLP predictions improved hit enrichment across library sizes.
💡 Points Based on the abstract

Four putative binders is a docking-plus-ML result, not a validated one, so I'd want biophysical confirmation (DSF, SPR, or a cocrystal) before calling them hits. LRH-1 pockets are lipophilic and promiscuous, so I'd also check the MLPs against a property-matched decoy set, since pose-derived features can mostly encode lipophilicity and size. The consensus gain over docking alone is the useful, transferable bit.

Computational Compound Prioritization Strategy Incorporating Docking Variability and Interaction Energies Identifies Putative LRH-1 Binders ↗