🧬 Pharmacology

Target biology, in vivo efficacy, translational research, DMPK and safety.

2026-10-23 1 article

A small-molecule BCL9/β-catenin blocker is tested in glioblastoma cells

  • Because BCL9, a β-catenin coactivator, had lacked small-molecule inhibitors, its therapeutic value in glioblastoma had not been tested pharmacologically.
  • The new inhibitor ZD37-28R was predicted by docking to bind β-catenin, and it disrupted the BCL9/β-catenin interaction in vitro.
  • It suppressed β-catenin-driven transcription and reduced proliferation and migration of U87-MG and U251 glioblastoma cells.
💡 Points

Wnt/β-catenin has been a graveyard for small molecules, and a BCL9-selective PPI blocker is a more tractable angle than hitting β-catenin broadly. The open questions are the usual PPI ones: direct biophysical evidence of binding rather than docking, selectivity against other β-catenin partners, and brain exposure for a glioma indication. Treat this as target validation work, not a lead yet.

Pharmacological Study of Novel Small-Molecule Inhibitors Targeting B-Cell Lymphoma 9/β-Catenin in the Treatment of Glioma ↗

2026-10-17 2 articles

Molecular glue RPT04402 restores PP2A trimer assembly in high-grade uterine cancer

  • The paper describes RPT04402, a molecular glue that restores formation of the PP2A AαB56αC heterotrimer in high-grade uterine cancer.
  • Recurrent PPP2R1A scaffold mutations in these tumors impair holoenzyme assembly, which the glue is designed to rescue.
  • Company reports describe regressions in preclinical PP2A-mutant models and a license to SpringWorks; this summary rests on the title and secondary sources, not the full text.
💡 Points

Phosphatases are famously hard to drug, so a glue that rebuilds a specific heterotrimer rather than inhibiting an active site is a smart route around that. Here the mutation defines both the patient population and the mechanism, a tidy match. I'd watch how selective it is among the many PP2A B-subunit complexes, since activating the wrong ones is the obvious tolerability worry.

Restoration of PP2A AαB56αC trimer formation by RPT04402 molecular glue in high-grade uterine cancer ↗

Oral TREM2 agonist VG-3927 reaches the clinic with preclinical and first-in-human data

  • The paper reports preclinical and first-in-human evaluation of VG-3927 (SAR448851), an orally dosed small-molecule TREM2 agonist for Alzheimer's disease.
  • Public reports describe good tolerability across ascending doses, central nervous system penetration, and a drop in the soluble TREM2 marker in cerebrospinal fluid.
  • This summary rests on the article listing and secondary reports, not the full text.
💡 Points

Most TREM2 efforts are antibodies, so a brain-penetrant oral agonist that shifts a CSF pharmacodynamic marker is a notable modality shift. The open question is whether lower soluble TREM2 reflects real receptor activation, since a marker can move without microglial function changing. The first-in-human data show exposure and engagement, not efficacy.

Preclinical and first-in-human evaluation of VG-3927/SAR448851, an oral small-molecule TREM2 agonist for Alzheimer's disease ↗

2026-10-13 1 article

Dual MOR/D3R ligand with a lower D3R/MOR ratio shows reduced abuse-related signals in mice

  • Dual ligands fuse the MOR partial agonist TRV734 with a D3R-antagonist trans-cyclopropylamine scaffold, aiming at safer opioid analgesics.
  • (R)-LS02-14 and TRV734 gave robust antinociception but similar abuse-liability and respiratory-depression signals.
  • (R)-LS01-64, with a much lower D3R/MOR ratio, gave modest analgesia but weaker reinforcing and conditioned-reward effects and minimal respiratory impact.
💡 Points

The data argue that the D3R/MOR balance, not mere D3R engagement, sets the behavioral profile, and the best safety came with less analgesia. That is the familiar trade-off, so the open question is whether a ratio exists that keeps efficacy while retaining the reward-dampening effect.

Further Development of Dual-Target Mu Opioid Receptor-Dopamine D3 Receptor (MOR-D3R) Ligands as Novel Therapeutics ↗

2026-10-05 1 article

DNA origami carrying a barnase variant is built to cleave mutant KRAS mRNA

  • Mutant KRAS variants are structurally diverse and lack druggable pockets, which has limited small-molecule inhibitors.
  • The authors assemble a degrader on a six-helix-bundle DNA origami scaffold that targets the mRNA rather than the protein.
  • One module pairs an engineered barnase variant with a programmable recognition strand, cutting RNA directly without relying on endogenous cellular machinery; a second module is designed for cell penetration.
💡 Points

If KRAS has no pocket worth chasing, going after the mRNA is a fair dodge, and a catalytic barnase gives a clean mechanism: sequence-guided cleavage, no reliance on endogenous machinery. But I would want to see the data before getting excited. How well does the recognition strand discriminate single-base mutants from wild-type KRAS, given barnase's cleavage is catalytic and unforgiving of leakage? And does it survive delivery, with real potency in cells and a sensible comparison to siRNA or ASO?

An Integrated DNA Origami-Based RNA Degrader for Targeted Degradation of Oncogenic Mutant KRAS mRNA ↗

2026-09-16 1 article

GPR41 Agonism Curbs Endotoxemic Inflammation via Autophagy-Dependent NF-κB Suppression

  • GPR41/FFAR3, a short-chain-fatty-acid-sensing GPCR, was tested as a target for dampening gut-derived endotoxemia in a macrophage model of endotoxin stress.
  • The selective agonist AR420626 activated GPR41 and blunted downstream pro-inflammatory signaling, cutting output of nitric oxide, IL-6, MCP-1, and iNOS.
  • This anti-inflammatory effect tracked to suppression of NF-κB signaling, the central pathway driving those mediators.
  • Agonist treatment also boosted autophagic flux, marked by increased LC3-I-to-LC3-II conversion.
  • Blocking autophagy pharmacologically erased AR420626's protective effect, indicating autophagy induction is mechanistically required rather than incidental to the anti-inflammatory action.
  • Findings position GPR41 as a druggable node linking gut microbial metabolite sensing to control of systemic inflammation in metabolic endotoxemia.
💡 Points

AR420626 is doing its job as a chemical probe here, not auditioning as a drug — worth keeping that line bright. The autophagy-blockade rescue experiment is the real anchor: losing the phenotype when you knock out autophagy is exactly the epistasis data that justifies chasing GPR41 rather than filing it under "yet another anti-inflammatory hit." Selectivity is my first question mark — GPR41 sits right next to GPR43/FFAR2 in the SCFA-sensing GPCR family, sharing pocket architecture, so I'd want counter-screens before trusting any binding-mode hypothesis. Tractability-wise, class A GPCRs are historically good chemical space, but SCFA-mimetic ligands trend small and polar — solid fragment-to-lead starting points, not obviously oral-bioavailable as-is. Early hit-validation signal, not a lead series yet.

G-Protein-Coupled Receptor 41 (GPR41) as a Therapeutic Target for Metabolic Endotoxemia: Mechanistic Insights into AR420626-Induced Autophagy and Nuclear Factor kappa B (NF-κB) Suppression ↗

Pharmacology archive →